“The Lead” In an interview with CNN’s Jake Topper on Tuesday, Newsom admitted that he was worried about being recalled and hoped it would qualify for the ballot, a risk for the California governor. Filled and unpredictable scenarios can occur if Democrats do not show a low-voting election.
If the measure is eligible, voters will be asked in the first question whether they want to recall Newsom and then a second question asking who they should replace. In 2003, he was chosen by a long list of names when California voters recalled former government chief Gray Davis, and was replaced by a former governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican. To broaden its support base, Newsom is touting the potential recall as being much larger than itself – and instead as a multi-layered partisan attack that threatens progressive goals and agendas.
Newsom said, “You all need about a quarter of the people who voted Donald Trump this November to call back the voters, so I’m guessing this (ballot) is going on. We’ll call it Taking it very seriously. ” Tapper told.
As he attempts to portray what he remembers as a fight against Trumpism, the California governor called some recalled supporters to be members of right-wing militia groups, QAN sympathizers, conspiracy theorists, and members of White Vermacist groups Is depicted as. When Tepper noted that the recall had indeed generated a broad base of support among Republicans and independents unhappy with dealing with the Kovid-19 epidemic, Newsom acknowledged that “it’s been a difficult year, And in laughter, we all specialize
A year ago this week, “California was the first state to initiate a stay-at-home order,” he said. “I think we saved thousands and thousands of lives.”
When pressed by Tupper about what he was thinking at the time, Newsom mentioned that restaurants were open in much of the state at the time, but said that it was “a mistake” and when he was “let down” He should have noticed that “there were too many people at the table.”
Newsom was quoted as saying by Topper, “What I was expressing was inconsistent. I have made this crystal clear on the occasion of the advertisement. It was a mistake. I have not made such a mistake before or since.” “” We are our own. We are human beings. And you have to move forward – and I move like a dog to fight every day to get our children back to school, get people vaccinated and get this economy going again. ” Growing up. ”
The California governor appeared in “The Lead” a day before the deadline to call back the proposers to submit approximately 1.5 million signatures to the state’s county registrars for verification. Organizers said last week that they had already collected about 2 million, a goal they set to ensure they had a cushion for duplicate or invalid entries. (The limit set for the state’s ability to remember 1,495,709 signatures is equal to 12% of the vote in the last Gubernatorial election.)
Now that the recall seems likely to qualify for the ballot, Newsom has suddenly changed strategy – shifting from brushing questions about it, calling it a serious threat to Californians. Over the past two days, the governor has been engaged in an unusual media blitz as his team halts his new counter-effort, the Republican recall, to raise funds and by casting recall supporters as extremist, anti-incumbent attackers To fire Democratic support and the types of violent rebels who attacked the US Capitol in support of Trump on 6 January.
News ABC said on Tuesday in ABC’s “The View”, “Am I worried about this? Surely I’m worried about it.” “The nature of these things – above or below the question – the zero-sum nature of the question is challenging … so we are taking it seriously.”
The recall effort was launched last year by retired Yolo County Sheriff’s Office Sgt. Orin Heatley and 124 others who filed a petition to recall Newsom based on their role in the state’s high taxes, widespread homelessness, lack of affordable housing, out-of-control wildfires and rolling blackouts.
Newscom’s interview blitz forced him into politically dangerous territory when he answered a question on MSNBC on Monday about whether he would replace Democratic California Sen. Diane Feinstein – if she was to retire – President Kamala Harris’s exit with a black woman to increase representation in that chamber after Vice
Newscom said on MSNBC that he had “many names” of Black women he could appoint to replace Finstein. The topic has come up with some frequency in recent months as progressive activists angry with Feinstein have questioned her age and fitness to serve.
Newsom told Tupper that he made the mistake of answering that straightforward question about Feinstein, but clarified that he expected him to remain in the US Senate and said there was “tremendous respect” for him. He described him as a true friend and said he counted him among his mentors in San Francisco, where he was an “extraordinary” mayor and a member of the County Board of Supervisors.
“She’s not going anywhere. I talk to her all the time,” Newsom said. “But in the context of that question about an imaginary, yes, I answered it, and I stick to my answer, but I have all the confidence in the world that I will never have to make that decision.
The story has been updated with additional quotes from Newsom’s interview on “The Lead” and other references.