Citi made a $500 million mistake. Here’s how that would play out for regular people
C

Citi made a $500 million mistake. Here’s how that would play out for regular people


A federal judge ruled that wire transfers were done by City ()C), Acting as Revlon’s loan agent, “were final and complete transactions, not subject to revocation.” However, in most cases of accidentally receiving wired transfers, this is not the case. In fact, you will have to pay back the money – or face criminal charges.
This is because a common law is known as “unjust enrichment”, which generally presumes that it is necessary to return the money to the recipient of the money received in error. A Pennsylvania couple Face felony charges After spending $ 120,000 accidentally deposited in his account in 2019.

But there is an exception that is applied in the case of Citigroup under a New York law. This law was brought to the fore in a 1991 case where the New York Court of Appeals ruled that a creditor could retain funds if a third party mistakenly sent money to a creditor.

That exception, called the discharge-for-value rule, allows the recipient to keep accidentally trapped money if the money that was accidentally transferred was unpublished, relieved of a valid debt, and the recipient was not aware that Payment was made by mistake.

It was taken to be the case Revlon’s ()Rev) Lender.

“District-for-value defense ultimately depends on whether the defendants (or, more accurately, their clients) were on constructive notice of Citibank’s fault at the time they received the wire transfer on August 11,” the verdict. To. “Based on credible testimony and documentary records of defendants’ employees, the court concludes that they were not.”

Revlon lenders said they believed the transfers from Citibank were prepayment for an outstanding loan – due to not being paid until 2023. “The judge matched the amount of principal and interest owed on the loan,” the judge said. .

Therefore, the court ruled that it was reasonable for Revlon lenders to assume that the payment was not made in error.

“Citibank is one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world. Thus, defendants and their clients may assume – and, indeed, assume – that the bank had effective internal controls to avoid significant mistakes,” the decision. It is written in

Citigroup said it intended to appeal the decision.

.


Source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

China faces huge climate and tech challenges in its bid for global leadership

China faces huge climate and tech challenges in its bid for global leadership This year "Two session" meeting - the most important annual event on...

Biden administration expected to form task force to deal with Microsoft hack linked to China

Biden administration expected to form task force to deal with Microsoft hack linked to China There are an estimated 30,000 affected customers in the US...

Princess Diana’s Former Aide Says Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Echo Past Royal Family Rifts

Princess Diana's Former Aide Says Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Echo Past Royal Family Rifts Meghan Markle tells Oprah 'Feeling of Liberating' who is finally...

Miley Cyrus says playing ‘Hannah Montana’ triggered an ‘identity crisis’

Miley Cyrus says playing 'Hannah Montana' triggered an 'identity crisis' Miley Cyrus said her role in the Disney Channel series "Hannah Montana" sparked an identity...