Absolutely right. And then almost right.
And as anyone who got 99 percent on a test can tell you, both are not the same thing.
The “Citizen Kane,” a 1941 Orton Wells classic about the rise and fall of the 1941 publication magnate Foster Kane, was an accurate critical score on the longtime film website, Rotten Tomatoes, which collected 115 reviews. Until last month.
This happens when a spoiler played a rewritten article decades ago by a critic.
80-year-old, at least-inactive review, “Citizen Kane failed to impress Critic as Greatest Ever Films” last month, re-coming to Rotten Tomatoes as part of a new archival project last month. The review, which ran in the Chicago Tribune in 1941 and was quietly added to the “Citizen Kane” page rotten Tomatoes In March, brought the classic film, which has been regularly screened Biggest American Films List, A peg or two.
“You’ve heard a lot about this picture and I see through the ads that some experts think it’s’ the greatest movie ever made,” is the critic, whose pun was the pseudonym By Main. “I don’t.”
problem? had some very Fresh, apparently.
“It’s interesting,” the reviewer wrote. “It’s different. In fact, it’s bizarre enough to become a museum piece. But the sacrifice from simplicity to eccentricity robs it of distinction and general entertainment value.”
The film’s black and white photography, which has been praised over the years for its atmospheric, noirish touch, has been criticized as “shadowy and creepy” by reviewers, who said it “gives a creep.”
“I wanted them to leave some sunlight.” (He was an admirer of Wells as an actor, however, calling him “an enthusiastic and effective artist”).
With the inclusion of his unconvincing opinion, the film is now rated at only 99 percent “fresh” Rotten tomatoes
This means that, according to the review site, there are now 63 films with at least 40 reviews that are now more universally acclaimed by critics than “Citizen Kane”. Workplace “100% Club” Some predictable classics (“Modern Times,” “Singin ‘in the Rain,” “The Maltese Falcon”) and some less predictable recent films (the first two “Toy Story” movies) are included.
A member of the club? “Paddington 2,” a children’s film about a bear, which By review site, “He spreads joy and jam wherever he goes.” Its writer and director, Paul King, Told the Hollywood Reporter While he was happy to list the film, he was not taking “Citizen Kane” seriously. He said, “I will not let it go to my head and build my Xanadu immediately.”
Rotten Tomatoes, who may soon take critical scores of more classics to earth as older archival reviews are added to the site, have previously admitted that members of the “100% Club” are not necessarily perfect.
“This is a hard way for a film to get 100% with critics, full of risk,” A page on the site Dedicated to the best percentage patterns Says. “What if a small plot hole is enough to annoy a big reviewer?” What if the cinematographer did not show up one day for an important scene? What if a bum was performed from one of the background extras? “
Mae Tinee was a minority opinion on “Citizen Kane” at the time.
“Despite some disconnecting laps and strange ambiguities in the creation of the main character,” critic Boson Crowther The New York Times has written After attending the 1941 premiere of the film at the Palace Theater, “Citizen Cane” is the most stunning and cinematic thriller motion picture to see here in many moons. “
“In fact,” he said, “it’s close to being the most sensational film ever made in Hollywood.”
The film is a biopic of Netflix’s “Mank”, “Citizen Kane”, “screenwriter” Herman J. Mankiewicz was also inspired, starring Gary Oldman and winning two Oscars on Sunday (but which critics rated Rotten Tomatoes 83 percent fresh) Belongs to.