But prosecutors also told a judge about the group’s use of golf carts for a race in the Capitol building – a reconstruction of a moment during an oath for violence, a push for violence with a hint of friend comedy. At one level the descriptions appear comical but the descriptions add a greater sense of desire among those who take the oath to participate.
One of the men, Robert Minuta, allegedly says during the chase, “We’re just en route in a grand theft auto golf cart in the Capitol Building.”
The plaintiffs wrote that Minuta and defendant Joshua James “loaded into the golf cart and proceeded toward the Capitol Building for approximately 90 minutes.” Minuta, apparently driving one of the golf carts talking about the war in the streets, revolves around law enforcement vehicles that are trying to shut down routes inside.
James “does not bail with the golf cart,” the prosecutor notes, “rather punching the Capitol Building address in his phone and instructing Minuta, assisting him in his pursuit.” In court on Friday, defense counsel for James said the golf cart ride did not meet any resistance by law enforcement at the time.
The video is showing this, prosecutors say. A court filing this week includes a red image from a golf cart’s surveillance camera under an office building, circulated in red. The video is not yet publicly available.
After swearing and walking out of the golf cart at an intersection near the Capitol, he allegedly guarded the building, according to court filings while dictating law enforcement.
On Friday, Judge Amit Mehta decided to release James from prison as he awaited trial, particularly as the judge said there was a history dating back to January 6 and was seasoned as a veteran citizen and recipient of Purple Heart . James will be imprisoned in the home and monitored electronically, and his communications will also be restricted.
Mehta said during the hearing on Friday, “Mr. James, I’m ready to tell you. I’m not sure why anyone in your position did this.” It actually cuts against what I think. Is that what you stand for and what this country is. “
The judge generally shared his thoughts on the attack, and the reaction of violent supporter Donald Trump when the former president lost the election.
The judge said, “We consider everything a fight to the death.” Mehta said that people who do not like the outcome of the election cannot prepare themselves to fight. “That’s not how democracy works … Just because America disagrees with you, doesn’t give you the right to set up a quick response force.”
Prosecutors were seeking to cast him as a prominent leader among the oath-keepers, but Mehta remarked that others accused in the case appeared at the top of the group’s hierarchy.
All defendants appearing before federal district judges in Washington, DC, pleaded not guilty.
In this case, the prosecution also alleged that members of the group discussed the preparations for the fight before 6 January, met that morning, conducive in protective gear and crowds forming a military-style “stack”. Infiltrated, hands with each other’s shoulders.
On Friday, prosecutors noted that James’ signal chat with an unnamed man discussed bringing a long rifle and side arm into the Capitol area, according to the court.
“So, I think I’m carrying a full gear less weapon?” Another man allegedly asked James on 2 January.
“Yes full gear … QRF weapons will just leave them home,” James said, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors say James also arrived at the signal to ask “operational leaders” to ask “do we have a field for weapons?”
Prosecutors say another leader of the group responded that he did not know of one.
Lawyers for James’s defense argued in court on Friday that his signal chat heads prior to January were about providing VIP protection to Republicans and not planning an attack.
After the riots
Prosecutors used the alleged actions of oaths after Jan. 6 to argue that they could strike again or hurt law enforcement investigations.
The Judicial Department filed in a courtroom Thursday night, “After being denied by Trump they were lost after expressing to others, the defendant took steps to conceal evidence or mollify potential witnesses.”
Prosecutors accused James of deleting a group chat on the messaging app Signal in a “surgical” manner, then after the rebellion damaged President Donald Trump’s election concession.
Prosecutors say, “We need to make sure that all the signal coms about the op are removed and burned.” “Just taking all the necessary precautions,” James added on the app. Prosecutors say another person on the thread confirmed the deletion of the message.
According to a petition filed in court this week, the photos on James’s device were removed from 6 January.
Illiterate oath keepers
With every court filing, prosecutors add to the list of anonymous, others unknown, who believe they negotiated with Minuta, James, and other sworn-in conspirators around January 6.
Prosecutors say Rhodes put Person Ten in command that day in DC. Neither has faced charges at this time.
Stoning has not been charged for any crime related to the riots.
This story has been updated with additional developments on Friday.
CNN’s Emma Tucker and Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report.