UK High Court finds Dubai’s Sheikh Mohammed hacked ex-wife’s phone using spyware


The UK’s most senior Family Court judge, Andrew MacFarlane, said in his ruling on Wednesday that he found that through a network of servants and agents, Sheikh Mohamed had accessed Princess Haya, her personal assistant, her lawyer Baroness Shackleton and Nicholas’ mobile phones. were hacked. Courtesy, and two members of his personal security staff “Pegasus” software Licensed to Dubai and UAE by an Israeli company.

The software used included the ability to track targets’ locations, listen to their telephone calls, access their contact lists, passwords, calendars and photos, and read messages received through apps, email and SMS.

“The findings represent a total abuse of trust and indeed an abuse of power,” MacFarlane said in his ruling.

“It is an abuse that is compounded by the way the father contested these allegations and instructed his lawyers. Despite the weight of the evidence, the fact of the hacking was never acknowledged, nor was it The fact was that this kind of hacking was done by Pegasus,” McFarlane said.

“At no stage has the father shown any sign of concern to the mother, who is caring for her children, on the grounds that her phone has been hacked and her security has been infiltrated. Instead, She has marshalled a formidable forensic team to challenge the findings. The mother sought and sought to fight the case against her at every point.”

The ruling came on Wednesday after a one-year reporting ban was lifted by the UK High Court’s Family Division.

In a statement on Wednesday, Sheikh Mohammed opposed the decision, saying it was based on “an incomplete picture”.

“I have always denied the charges leveled against me and I continue to do so. These matters relate to alleged handling of state security. As a head of government involved in private family proceedings, it is my duty to give evidence on such sensitive matters. either personally or through my advisors in a foreign court. Neither the Emirate of Dubai nor the UAE is a party to these proceedings, and they did not participate in the hearing. Therefore the conclusion is essentially a are based on an incomplete picture,” his statement said.

“Furthermore, the findings were based on evidence that was not disclosed to me or my advisors. I therefore maintain that they were made in a way that was unfair,” it continued.

Dubai is one of the seven emirates that make up the United Arab Emirates.

Because Sheikh Mohammed is the ruler of Dubai and the Vice President and Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates, his lawyers argued that the Foreign Act (FAS) doctrine – which prevents a court from examining the legality of acts committed by a foreigner. State – The jurisdiction of the UK High Court was undermined in this matter.

In January, MacFarlane and Justice Martin Chamberlain ruled that the FAS doctrine does not prevent the court from ruling on Princess Haya’s claims.

Conclusion a. are part of series of ongoing hearings Inducted Princess Haya in London, and followed a ruling delivered in March 2020, which concluded that Sheikh Mohammed had previously organized the kidnapping of his two daughters and forcibly returned them to Dubai, where he gave them his wish. was placed against.

Sheikh has repeatedly denied all the claims raised in the ongoing case.

Correction: An earlier version of this story misidentified the capital of the United Arab Emirates. This is Abu Dhabi.

.



Source link

Popular Topics

Related Articles