Tuesday, April 13, 2021

White House says Americans deserve ‘better information’ because allies criticize WHO coronavirus report

“I think he believes in the American people, the global community, medical experts, doctors – all those people working to save lives, families who have lost loved ones – they all deserve more transparency. , “Psaki told reporters at the White House briefing.

The US and 12 other countries issued a joint statement calling for an independent and fully transparent assessment questioning the WHO report and the European Union called for better access to researchers and better investigations.

Officials in 219 countries and regions have reported this 127.9 million Kovid-19 cases According to Johns Hopkins University, China reported its first cases to the WHO in December 2019 and killed 2.8 million people. More than 30 million Americans fell ill and more than 550,000 people died.

“They deserve better information,” Saki said of the Americans. “They deserve steps that are provided by the global community.” He criticized China for lack of transparency and called Beijing to provide data and answers to the global community.

Four scenarios

120 pages WHO Report, Released on Tuesday, states a scenario where the virus spreads through an intermediate animal host, possibly capturing a wild animal and then raised on a farm, “is very likely.” Investigations have not found which bat the other animal was infected with – believed to be the most likely original source of the virus – and can then be transmitted to a human.

Another possible probability scenario is a direct transmission from one of the animals carrying a similar coronavirus, such as a bat or pangolin.

Two other scenarios were not considered. The report stated that introduction through cold food products is a “possible route” and that introduction through the laboratory phenomenon was considered “an extremely likely route”.

There is no evidence to support the laboratory theory, and World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adholm Ghebayeus said on Tuesday that the WHO team concluded it was “the least likely hypothesis.”

Still, he said the agency would continue to explore the possibility.

Tedros gave information about this in the report, according to a copy of his comment.

“While the team concludes that a laboratory leak is the least likely hypothesis, it requires further investigation, potentially additional missions involving specialist personnel, which I am prepared to deploy,” Tedros said. said. He said he did not believe the WHO assessment was “comprehensive enough. Further data and studies would be needed to reach a more robust conclusion.”

Sasaki said on Tuesday that “the analysis done to date from our experts – his concern is that there is an additional support for a hypothesis,” without specifying who he was referring to. The WHO report “does not take us any closer to understanding or more than six or nine months ago about the origin. It does not provide us with directions or steps on how we should prevent this from happening.” Future, ”he said.

Months of tension follow from the WHO report, Sakchi’s comments and statements from the US and allies and the European Union, especially between the US and China, compared to the original Coronavirus. China initially rejected initial reports of the virus, leading scientists to discover that they had tried to warn the public, even as millions of Chinese spread across the country for the Lunar New Year celebrations.

The WHO’s initial statements echoed China closely, putting the global agency’s misrepresentation at bay. The WHO first delayed declaring the virus a public health emergency, and then calling it an epidemic, prompting Trump administration officials to raise questions about its reliability and independence. US lawmakers asked to investigate whether China manipulated the WHO’s initial response and the Trump White House cut funding for the organization, which has been reinstated by the Biden administration.

Coronavirus Outbreak Timeline Fast Facts

The WHO’s concerns about independence, however, and the reactions of diplomats from various countries and Tuesday’s statements made it clear that they are not limited to the US.

A European diplomat said that the presence and report of a WHO mission on the ground was “only a first step, we need further study for clear results about the origin of the virus and we need more access to data and samples . “

Others pointed to the need to establish clear lessons from the incident.

‘Not very good’

“The joint statement is not as aggressive as it may have been under previous administrations, I suspect, which made it easier to support, but this statement could have been even more difficult and the Chinese response to the process was not good enough. , “Another European diplomat, who echoed the views of other messengers who spoke to CNN.

“The point is what do the next steps look like? If we don’t have a working system to learn a lesson and respond quickly when there is a problem, we don’t have a working system to protect people,” the diplomat said. said . “Where we have seen that the world is getting healthier and safer, where you have a very clear system for learning lessons and dealing with problems and if we take an approach that is similar to China, we have another problem. About to happen. It’s unbearable. ”

The governments of Australia, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Republic of Korea, Slovenia and the United Kingdom signed joint statements with the US.

Describing the work of WHO experts as key to understanding how the Kovid-19 pandemic began and spread, the joint statement pointed to the shortcomings in the agency’s report as “significantly delayed and complete, access to original data and samples.” Reduced “.

World leaders call for unity for pandemic treaty: & # 39;  No one is safe until we are all safe;

“We are involved in expressing shared concerns about a recent WHO-convened study in China, while at the same time developing and using a fast, effective, transparent, science-based and independent process internationally Reinforce the importance of working together in the direction of. Evaluation of such outbreaks of unknown origin in the future, “Tuesday’s joint statement said.

The European Union issued its statement expressing similar concerns in slightly softer language. “Only through an in-depth review of the origin of the virus and its transmission in human populations, will we be able to better understand and control this epidemic, and better prevent and prepare for future health emergencies,” This, said before urging further. Detection and better accessibility.

“While regretting the late start of the study, the late deployment of experts and the limited availability of preliminary samples and related data, we consider the work to date and the report released today to be a helpful first step,” he said.

CNN’s Jeff Zeleni in Washington, Sarah Dean and Nick Patan Walsh in London, and Jacqueline Howard contributed to this report


Source link

Translate »